Lots has been done to document good steak and pastor at Chicago's taco stands. Now what about the humble milanesa/milaneza? No antojito filling suffers more in Chicago's taco stands, other than perhaps the chile relleno. A long-ago-fried, gristly breaded cutlet just doesn't come back to life when it's chopped up and griddled, the way that bits of steak, pork or choizo might.
I was pleasantly surprised to see the DF owner/chef at Taco Grill (Ogden in Downer's) take a paper=thin, floppy, breadcrumb-dredged steak out of the fridge and throw it in some oil when I ordered a torta the other day. The sandwich was fantastic because of it (bread, a very long and narrow torpedo I hadn't before seen was good too). It struck me that the only milanesas (other than at sit-down spots) I've seen fried to order were here and at Taq. Puebla. Dona Torta doesn't do it, slicing pre-cooked milanesa into strips.
[PS, a couple of years back, Taco Grill gat a fairly poor review from Steve Dolinski, whom I generally trust. I had heard that the place went uphill, and I think it must have. Part of the pan was about how the food was gringo-ed up. While the place does look more corporate, and has nachos, nice decor and cold beer, the menu has plenty of Mexico-Mexican stuff: DF huaraches, alhambres, enmolados (mole enchiladas), pastor on a spit with onions and pineapple, cesina and carnitas as meat choices; menudo on weekends. The "salsa bar" is a gimmick that really works for me. Maybe 20 kinds, all quite different from each other but familiar (that is, not invented there), plus various vegetables in escabeche. Don't get me wrong, it is kind of a cutesy place housed in a former Long John's, but everything I tasted raged from very good (torta) to OK (cecina taco). Reminded me more of certain "upscale" So Cal. taquerias such as Super Rica than anything I've seen here, where I think the formula for Mexican owners who want to reach out to the non-Mexican community tends more toward the common denominator and taco burrito palace places.]